Law enforcement: is it high-risk under the EU AI Act?
AI used by or for law-enforcement authorities for individual risk assessment, as polygraphs, to evaluate evidence reliability, or to profile individuals in the course of detection, investigation or prosecution.
Classification test
Falling in this domain is necessary but not sufficient. Under Article 6(2) the system is high-risk only if it also performs one of the specific functions the domain's text lists. Some predictive-policing and untargeted uses are prohibited under Article 5 rather than high-risk under Annex III.
Example systems
- Individual crime-risk assessment tools
- Evidence-reliability evaluation
- Investigative profiling systems
If it is high-risk, these obligations apply
- Declare accuracy metrics in instructions for use — Provider
- Evidence robustness / resilience — Provider
- Evidence AI-specific cybersecurity — Provider
- Run a lifecycle risk-management system — Provider
- Govern training, validation and test data — Provider
- Assign human oversight and use per instructions (deployer) — Deployer
- Draw up & maintain the Annex IV technical file — Provider
- Classify the system against Article 6 / Annex III — Provider, Deployer
- Register in the EU database — Provider, Deployer
- Complete conformity assessment before market — Provider
All high-risk (Annex III) obligations → · How to classify under Article 6 →
Legal source
FAQ
Is law enforcement AI high-risk under the EU AI Act?
It is high-risk under Article 6(2) if it matches the Annex III law enforcement domain and performs a listed function. Some predictive-policing and untargeted uses are prohibited under Article 5 rather than high-risk under Annex III.
What must I do if it is high-risk?
Run a risk-management system, govern your data, keep the Annex IV technical file, evidence accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity, complete conformity assessment and register in the EU database.
Stay audit-ready as the Act changes
EU AI Regulation Decoded tracks each obligation and the evidence auditors expect — one practitioner email a week.
Subscribe — free, weeklyNot legal advice. This is a practitioner reference generated from a cited knowledge base built on the primary legal text and official Commission guidance. Verify against the cited primary sources before relying on it for a compliance decision. See editorial standards & methodology.