Skip to content
EU AI Regulation DecodedKnowledge Platform

Classify the system against Article 6 / Annex III

Determine whether the system is high-risk: does it fall in an Annex III domain AND perform a listed function (6(2)), or is it an Annex I product/safety-component (6(1))? Apply the 6(3) not-significant-risk exception only with a documented justification.

Last reviewed 2026-07-30Version 1Primary sources 3Status Under editorial review
Applies to
Provider, Deployer
Scope
High-risk (Annex III use case), High-risk (Annex I regulated product)
Applies from
2027-12-02 — Stand-alone high-risk (Annex III) obligations apply
Derives from
Article 6 · Annex III
Primary source
Art. 6 AIA · Annex III AIA · Commission draft HRAI guidelines, 19 May 2026

Evidence an auditor expects

Audit red flags

Fails an audit

Common mistakes

FAQ

What evidence do I need for Article 6?
High-risk classification decision record. Each should be contemporaneous, versioned, and traceable to the system version.

When does “Classify the system against Article 6 / Annex III” apply?
From 2027-12-02 — Stand-alone high-risk (Annex III) obligations apply. It applies to: Provider, Deployer.

What fails an audit here?
Relying on the Article 6(3) 'not significant risk' exception without a documented justification.

Legal source

Art. 6 AIA · Annex III AIA · Commission draft HRAI guidelines, 19 May 2026

Explained in the newsletter

Stay audit-ready as the Act changes

EU AI Regulation Decoded tracks each obligation and the evidence auditors expect — one practitioner email a week.

Subscribe — free, weekly

Not legal advice. This is a practitioner reference generated from a cited knowledge base built on the primary legal text and official Commission guidance. Verify against the cited primary sources before relying on it for a compliance decision. See editorial standards & methodology.