Justice & democratic processes: is it high-risk under the EU AI Act?
AI intended to assist a judicial authority in researching and interpreting facts and the law and applying it, or to influence the outcome of an election or referendum or voting behaviour.
Classification test
Falling in this domain is necessary but not sufficient. Under Article 6(2) the system is high-risk only if it also performs one of the specific functions the domain's text lists. Tools for purely administrative or ancillary court activities are generally out of scope.
Example systems
- Tools assisting judges in legal research and fact interpretation
- Systems intended to influence voting behaviour or election outcomes
If it is high-risk, these obligations apply
- Declare accuracy metrics in instructions for use — Provider
- Evidence robustness / resilience — Provider
- Evidence AI-specific cybersecurity — Provider
- Run a lifecycle risk-management system — Provider
- Govern training, validation and test data — Provider
- Assign human oversight and use per instructions (deployer) — Deployer
- Draw up & maintain the Annex IV technical file — Provider
- Classify the system against Article 6 / Annex III — Provider, Deployer
- Register in the EU database — Provider, Deployer
- Complete conformity assessment before market — Provider
All high-risk (Annex III) obligations → · How to classify under Article 6 →
Legal source
FAQ
Is justice & democratic processes AI high-risk under the EU AI Act?
It is high-risk under Article 6(2) if it matches the Annex III justice & democratic processes domain and performs a listed function. Tools for purely administrative or ancillary court activities are generally out of scope.
What must I do if it is high-risk?
Run a risk-management system, govern your data, keep the Annex IV technical file, evidence accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity, complete conformity assessment and register in the EU database.
Stay audit-ready as the Act changes
EU AI Regulation Decoded tracks each obligation and the evidence auditors expect — one practitioner email a week.
Subscribe — free, weeklyNot legal advice. This is a practitioner reference generated from a cited knowledge base built on the primary legal text and official Commission guidance. Verify against the cited primary sources before relying on it for a compliance decision. See editorial standards & methodology.